Last month, the New York Law Journal published an excellent article about the Family Justice Law Center. The article aptly describes the Center as
a first-of-its-kind organization that intends to engage in affirmative litigation with the [Administration for Children’s Services] —hitting it with lawsuits to potentially hold it accountable for allegedly violating families’ constitutional rights via heavy-handed investigatory and removal tactics.
“It is incredibly traumatic when government agents enter a person’s home and there’s the looming threat of a child removal,” [founder David] Shalleck-Klein told the Law Journal. “And of course, the harm is enormous when government agents do remove a child from a parent … sometimes in the middle of the night, in incredibly traumatic ways. Those harms stay with children.”
Of course, the reporter turned to ACS, the city’s family policing agency, for comment. An agency flack ignored most of the abuses Shalleck-Klein mentioned, discussing only one, so-called emergency removals when the caseworker not only demands entry, not only interrogates the children and families, often in the middle of the night, not only stripsearches the children but also, on top of all that, tears the children from their parents on-the-spot without even asking a judge first, let alone having a formal court hearing.
The flack’s response is a one-paragraph masterpiece of dissembling and misdirection. So let’s have a look, line by line. The flack’s comments are in italics, followed by a brief discussion of each claim.
Emergency removals occur in fewer than 2% of ACS child protection cases
Actually, a comparison of data in the Mayor’s Management Report to ACS’ own data on removals suggests it’s more like 3%. But assuming the flack is correct, what that really tells us is that a minimum of 98% of what ACS does is b------t. The figure apparently is based on the total number of cases ACS investigates. But overwhelmingly, these are so obviously false they fail to meet even the minimum standards for a caseworker to check a box on a form declaring the case “indicated.” Almost all of the rest are cases in which family poverty is confused with neglect. In short, the workers spin their wheels, and the families suffer all sorts of trauma, for nothing.
and happen only when our highly trained staff
Highly trained? All you need is a bachelor’s degree in any number of fields, a minimal amount of relevant coursework, and a six-week training course. You are then empowered to tear children from their homes on-the-spot.
feel that a child is in immediate danger and unable to get a court order in time to keep the child safe20 to 25% of the time and send the child right back home. That suggests the proportion of cases when judges should do that is far higher. Oh, and one other thing: In America police – even the family police – are supposed to make their decisions based on evidence, not on their feelings.
ACS is committed to keeping families together whenever that is safely possible and, in the vast majority of investigations, children are not removed from their homes.
Again, that’s because the vast majority of investigations are investigations of false reports.
Our robust continuum of family support services has successfully led to a 36% reduction in the number of children entering foster care from 2017 to 2021,
But the number went up again in 2022.
with foster care now at all-time low of less than 7,200 children.
But that doesn’t mean families are left alone. As the Movement for Family Power points out, as foster care has declined, there’s been almost a one-for-one increase in oppressive family surveillance that, itself, inflicts needless trauma on children and families.
|Graphic from Movement for Family Power
So thank you ACS flack. Your refusal to accept responsibility for the harm the agency does shows exactly why organizations like the Family Justice Law Center are needed.